This document compares jsocketpp to other popular C++ libraries that provide socket functionality. It highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each, helping users choose the right tool for their needs.

---

1. jsocketpp (this library)

Overview:

• Modern C++20 cross-platform abstraction for TCP, UDP, and Unix sockets.
• Java-like API for ease of use.
• Supports Windows, Linux, and POSIX systems.
• Focuses on simplicity, exception safety, and clear error reporting.

Advantages:

• Simple, consistent API across platforms.
• Exception-based error handling.
• Modern C++ idioms (RAII, smart pointers, std::string, etc.).
• Supports both stream (TCP) and datagram (UDP) sockets, plus Unix domain sockets.
• Designed for easy integration with CMake, Conan, and vcpkg.

Disadvantages:

• Not as feature-rich as some larger frameworks (e.g., no async/event loop, SSL/TLS, or HTTP built-in).
• Smaller user base and ecosystem compared to Boost or ASIO.
• No built-in support for advanced networking protocols.

---

2. Boost.Asio

Overview:

• Part of the Boost C++ Libraries.
• Provides low-level and high-level networking (TCP, UDP, serial ports, timers, etc.).
• Supports synchronous and asynchronous I/O.

Advantages:

• Very powerful and flexible.
• Asynchronous/event-driven programming support.
• Large user base and extensive documentation.
• Can be used with or without Boost dependencies (header-only in recent versions).
• SSL/TLS support via OpenSSL.

Disadvantages:

• Steeper learning curve due to complexity.
• More boilerplate for simple use cases.
• Error handling is not exception-based by default (uses error_code pattern).
• May be overkill for simple socket needs.

---

3. Poco::Net

Overview:

• Part of the POCO C++ Libraries.
• Provides networking, HTTP, SMTP, FTP, and more.
• Object-oriented, high-level API.

Advantages:

• High-level abstractions for many protocols (HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc.).
• Good documentation and active development.
• Cross-platform.

Disadvantages:

• Larger dependency footprint.
• More complex build and integration process.
• May be too heavyweight for projects needing only basic sockets.

---

4. Qt Network Module

Overview:

• Part of the Qt framework.
• Provides TCP, UDP, SSL, HTTP, and WebSockets.
• Integrates with Qt's event loop and signal/slot system.

Advantages:

• Seamless integration with Qt applications.
• High-level, event-driven API.
• SSL/TLS and HTTP support.

Disadvantages:

• Requires Qt (large dependency, not always suitable for non-GUI projects).
• Not header-only; requires Qt build system.
• Not ideal for non-Qt projects.

---

5. Native BSD/POSIX/WinSock APIs

Overview:

• Direct use of system socket APIs (e.g., socket(), bind(), connect(), etc.).

Advantages:

• Maximum control and performance.
• No dependencies.
• Universally available.

Disadvantages:

• Verbose and error-prone.
• Platform differences require many #ifdefs.
• No abstraction for resource management (manual cleanup required).
• No exception safety or modern C++ features.

---

Summary Table

Library	Cross-Platform	Async Support	High-Level API	SSL/TLS	Lightweight	Modern C++	Easy Integration
jsocketpp	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes
Boost.Asio	Yes	Yes	Medium	Yes	Medium	Yes	Yes
Poco::Net	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Partial	Medium
Qt Network	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Partial	Only with Qt
Native APIs	No	No	No	No	Yes	No	Yes

---

Conclusion

• Use jsocketpp for simple, modern, cross-platform socket programming with minimal dependencies.
• Use Boost.Asio or Poco::Net for advanced networking, async/event-driven code, or protocol support.
• Use Qt Network if you are already using Qt.
• Use native APIs only if you need maximum control and are comfortable handling platform differences.

Choose the library that best fits your project's needs and complexity!